In the Long Run

For several days this last week, Eliot Spitzer’s problems were headline news. The media eagerly reported the shocking saga of the fierce crimebuster’s own criminal fiasco, his resignation from office, and possible litigation against him. The factual tale is genuinely headline newsworthy, and undoubtedly, reporters and audience alike are incredulous at the arrogant duplicity of Spitzer’s self-defeating behavior.

But what is not newsworthy is the endless analysis and interpretation burgeoning from the scandal. Every news anchor and commentator has expressed his or her opinions, and, in addition, presented an array of “experts” who have also pontificated and postured. The main questions debated seem to be: “What would make Spitzer do it?” and “Why does his wife stand by him?” Some of the commentary is absurd, as when one analyst suggested that Silda Spitzer was to blame for her husband’s misdeeds. These “news stories” are in reality just salacious speculation and sensationalism. The anchors and reporters do not possess the professional credentials to make judgments, nor do the “experts” have all the background and relevant information necessary to diagnose.

Report the crime, report any charges filed, report a trial and a verdict. Those stories are newsworthy. But leave the rest to Spitzer and his family to work out. It is none of our business, and it should not be the business of the news media.

Posted by Cyppy at 4:11 PM